1 Samurg

Argumentative Essay About Violence In Video Games

Hey, guys. I just finished my personal argumentative essay about how violent video games do not increase aggression in adolescents. Please tell me what you think, whether it is about the way my essay is structured, any grammar errors, and also about the topic itself. I'd be happy to read all of your comments! NO SPAMMING AND FLAMING PLEASE! Thanks!

Stop Blaming Video Games!

The video games phenomenon is somewhat new in this modern society. Although they often to be entertaining, the contents have become more violent and disturbing as computing technology has become much more advanced. These days, the popularity of violent video games has caused an increase in controversy. Parents and experts feel that some games are just too violent and they demand the government to regulate the sales of these games. However, I strongly believe violent video games do not cause an increase in aggression in adolescents and the forceful plan by the government is caused by an exaggeration of the effects of violent video games and this plan are indeed pointless.

Besides the violent contents, video games have several positive aspects. Based on my experience, video games can push children's competence to the limit by forcing them to master certain ability to overcome the obstacles in the level. For example, "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six" series have become one of the games that require a solid teamwork. The player acts as the leader of an elite anti-terrorist squad consist of 3-4 members. At the beginning of the game, players can choose how to infiltrate the terrorist compound, either by planting an explosive on the door, using a fast rope from the rooftop or simply breaching into several doors to create a surprise assault. These options will ignite the sense of logical thinking and strategy formations in which formal education does not offer.

Aside from the cognitive aspects, video games are also the tool of social interactions. Friendships can sometimes be developed through playing video games and ultimately keeping them away from drug usage and violent activities. Most of the video games today have either multiplayer or online capabilities or even both. For example, I made friends with several Japanese and lots of Americans from playing "Call of Duty 4" online. The game focuses on eliminating the other team hence teamwork has a major role in succeeding the game. With a headset (a combination of a headphone and a microphone), my team members and I discuss and plan a strategy effectively and sometimes talk about our backgrounds. Personally, meeting lots of people online develop my English ability (since English is not my first language) and social skills because for some people, starting a conversation with a stranger can be really tough. In general, video game is an astonishing tool to keep children entertained during leisure time.

On the other hand, some people, although they already know some of the positive aspects of video games, still believe that the negative will overcome the positive ones. The article "Don't Shoot: Why Video Games Really Are Linked to Violence"by Amanda Schafferfrom Slate.com stated "The connection between violent games and real violence is also fairly intuitive. In playing the games, kids are likely to become desensitized to gory images, which could make them less disturbing and perhaps easier to deal with in real life.When video games aren't about violence, their capacity to teach can be a good thing. For patients suffering from arachnophobia, fear of flying, or post-traumatic stress disorder, therapists are beginning to use virtual realities as a desensitization tool."(Schaffer) Though thispresents an evidence that violent games do in fact increaseviolent thoughts, this data still cannot serve as an evidence because the test is conducted in a controlled environment, without considering other aspects that might result inthe change in behavior. Additionally, although violent video games might expose children to violent behavior, the amount of violenceare not as great as the ones in movies and television. Thenews is filled with stories of war and murder, and nearly every movie contains some forms of violence. Plus, these two media are different from games in a very important way because they involve realpeople, not computer-generated characters. As mentioned by Dr. Kipling D. Williams Ph. D, one of the social psychological science faculties in Purdue University, children's violent tendencies can be diverted towards violent video games rather than actually doing it in the real life. (Williams)

Prof. Williams also pointed out that, besides playing violent games, genetics and environmental aspects and self-control must be considered as some of the factors that contribute to the increase in aggressiveness. Genetics tend to play a huge role in personality of a person. Some person might have a tendency to be more rebellious and aggressive. Moreover, easier access to firearms in several countries can lead to violent thoughts and behaviors. "Guns can act as a stimulus because it reminds the person of aggressive behaviors seen on television or maybe in real life. If the person does not have a solid self-control, it can lead him to a violent behavior." (Williams) Self-control is one of the main aspects because no matter how many violent stimuli in the environment are, self-control can suppress one's violent and aggressive thoughts.

Prof. Williams strongly believes that there is no single cause that can lead to an increase in aggressive behavior in children, consistent with Dr. Craig A. Anderson, Ph. D statement during an interview with MSNBC, "Video game violence is only one risk factor for aggressive behavior in the real world. There are also dozen or so known risk factors. It is not the smallest risk factor, but it is an important one." (Anderson)

Finally, I believe that regulations will not prevent children from playing the games they want to. They will still get their hands on those games, whether from a parent, sibling, or older friend. Making violent video games illegal might increase children's curiosity and make the child want to play it more so that heor she can see form himself what all the controversy is about. I think that the responsibility lies within the parent, not the government.

Works Cited

Schaffer, Amanda. "Don't Shoot Why Video Games Really are Linked to Violence." Slate. 27 April 2007. 18 Apr. 2008.

"Violent Video Game." MSNBC TV. 19 Sept. 2006. 18 Feb. 2008.

Williams, Kipling D. Personal interview. 24 Mar. 2008.


in a game. It may distort their perception of reality, and confuse them about what is acceptable and justifiableand what is not. In contrast, any sort of fantasy monsters or androids will be excluded from the ban. Childrenwho play video games are able to understand the distinction between the reality and the made-up reality inthe video games where fantasy creatures are involved. However, when humans come into the picture, thisconcept may be more difficult to grasp, and therefore, children should be restricted from being able to purchase such video games and play them without the consent with their parent.It is true that video game industry already rates its games, so that people, and especially parent, canorient themselves in the matter of which games are appropriate for which age group. These ratings serve as aguidance for finding the appropriate age boundary for each game. In the US, these rating are set by theEntertainment Software Rating Board. Ratings distinguish age groups such as 12+, 15+, 17+, or adults only.In addition, they present information about explicit content including violence and sexual content. Thecurrent ratings are useful in rough understanding of which games are suitable for children, and which theyshould be allowed to play. However, they do not actually restrict selling inappropriate games to children.They merely caution of inappropriate content. The problem with ESRB is also that the game industry choosewhich restrictions provided by ESRB it will place on the package of the games. There is a certain number of restrictions that must be there, but in the end this restrain is voluntary, so they may decide which of them will be disclosed on the package (Hutchison, 2007)

9 .

Therefore, not all information may be presented.Due to the ratings acting only as a guidance, parents might not be cautious enough about the contentsof the game that they are buying. “Parents mistakenly assume that just because video games are marketed tothe kids, they are appropriate for kids. This is not so.” (Carpenter, & Ferguson, 2009)


. This banwould help parents understand that they should pay more attention to the content of certain games, that theylet their children play. Until reaching the 18


year of life, parents serve as guardians, and they takeresponsibility for their child's development. The ban of video games would help the parents to protect andcontrol the development of their children in moral terms. Very often, children play games during the timesthat their parents are not at home. So, it is hard to keep track of what games the children are playing, andoften the parents might not be even aware of it. There are many ways of parental control for the consolesand computers, but it is easy for children to overcome that with the help of internet.


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *